Introduction. Let be any arbitrary set. We say a set
is a subset of
(written
) if every element of
is also an element of
. For example,
, every set is a subset of itself, and the empty set is the only subset of itself.
Again consider set . We define the power set of
,
, as
.
Thus the power set of is “the set of all subsets of
”. Here are a few examples of power sets:
- Let
. Then the power set of
is
;
- Let
. Then the power set of
is
;
- The power set of
is
. Notice that these two are different: the former is a set with no elements, while the latter is a set with a single element which happens to be the empty set.
We now pose an interesting question: given a set with
elements (written
), what is the number of elements of its power set
(written
)? Peeking at concrete examples like those above,
looks like the correct answer — even for the last one, since
. But is it really so?
Theorem. Let denote an arbitrary set such that
. Then
.
Proof. The proof is by induction on the number of elements of .
For the base case, suppose . Clearly,
. But the empty set is the only subset of itself, so
.
Now the induction step. Suppose ; by the induction hypothesis, we know that
. Let
be a set with
elements, namely
. There are two kinds of subsets of
: those that include
and those that don’t. The first are exactly the subsets of
, and there are
of them. The latter are sets of the form
, where
; since there are
possible choices for
, there must be exactly
subsets of
of which
is an element. Therefore
.